I’m not all
that good at “allocating investments.” However, I have come up with some ideas
that are at least good enough to write a blog about.
Allocating
your investments is very much like shopping for Pesach. It’s very stressful and
there are no guarantees. However, the better you plan your menus, the more
likely it is that you will be successful at avoiding Rami Levi the night before
the seder.
The stress
is actually quite fitting because you stand to gain or lose more by how you
decide to allocate your money than you will by deciding which specific stocks
or bonds to buy. I’ve only made it worse by convincing you that you also need
to consider whether your money is invested in dollars or shekel. (No need to
thank me – that’s what I’m here for.)
This blog is
on the “internet,” where there is already enough written about “how to allocate
your portfolio” to make your head spin. I see no reason to be redundant on this
topic. If you want to make your head spin, you could easily just pour yourself
four large glasses of wine. That is why I recommend that you sip – not gulp –
that wine as you think about how to allocate your investments.
The 60/40
Portfolio
The 60/40
portfolio allocation is the starting point for most allocation strategies that you
read about on the “internet.” You can find plenty of articles on it from the
basic to the advanced, but only at Investing by Accident can we say that anyone
who wants to understand asset allocation must read these 3 principles:
- Stocks historically have performed much better than bonds. This makes us want to put all of our money into stocks. However, the trouble is that they fluctuate considerably in value. This means that for any given time, we could see a huge drop in the value of our investments. We do not like losing money, even though we’re pretty sure over time that it will recover.
- Bonds historically have not performed as well as stocks. This does not want to make us put all of our money into bonds. However, they fluctuate relatively less than stocks. This means that in any given year, we can usually count on having our money if we keep it in bonds. We like having money.
- Stocks and bonds tend to fluctuate in value differently, at different times. This means that on average they will not have good years and bad years at the same time.
Making it
Complicated
The experts
began to ponder each part of the 60/40 and wonder which investments within
“stocks” and “bonds” were really the best. They were motivated by the fact that
any expert who expounds on the virtues of asset allocation is considered
praiseworthy.
They
analyzed whether it would be best to invest in large, medium or small
companies. Then, they considered whether it was better to invest in “value” or
“growth” stocks. Before long, the experts starting looking at where “real
estate” and stocks with “high dividend yields” belong within the allocation.
Soon thereafter, other experts began suggesting that thinking about stocks as
“domestic” or “international” would be particularly interesting. More recently,
experts have been looking at “alternative investments,” but we simply do not
have enough wine for that.
In bonds,
the choices are much simpler, but there is still enough room for experts.
Should you invest in long, intermediate or short bonds? Should they be regular bonds
or inflation protected?
So Now What!?
I have been
struggling with how to allocate investments for as long as I can remember
having money. I guess that wouldn’t be very long. But still.
There are
many highly intelligent systems that you could follow that should make it very
easy. I recently came across Paul Merriman’s investment approach which contains
a lot of wisdom that I’ve read about in other places as well.
He even translates his allocation recommendations to a practical guide by
listing the ETF’s that you could buy to use it.
I want to allocate
my portfolio just the way Paul did at the time that he allocated his, but I
find myself struggling to come up with a plan. The first challenge is that I’m
never quite sure whether I want to be “aggressive” or “conservative.” I like to
think about myself as a “moderately aggressive Orthodox with a cynical
conservatism” which just isn’t one of the options.
The other
issue is that even when I think I know precisely what I want to invest in, I
find it almost impossible to apply the allocation. I have 10 different accounts
(5 retirement and 5 non-retirement) in two different countries.
I suppose
that 10 should be manageable, but I have to balance it against investment
options that are limited in different ways in each account. Worse still, there are
25 words in the last sentence and 10 times 25 is 250 which is a lot of plagues.
If so, you
should refill your cup now, which could only mean that are you wondering…
How is
Investing by Accident’s advice on allocation different than all other advice?
The obvious
answer I could give you is that we were slaves to our money before you read
this blog, but that would be too easy.
The less
obvious answer is that my advice is to think about the different kinds of money
that you have and allocate each one according to its own special nature.
In other
words, this blog speaks to the 4 types of money: Wise, Wicked, Simple
and I-Have-No-Idea. I’ll explain them in increasing complexity:
Simple
Money. You have a certain amount of money (hopefully, less than or equal to
your monthly income) that you are using for your expenses (food, shelter,
clothing, bank fees, etc.). This money is very easy to invest because you
shouldn’t be investing it at all. You should just keep it cash and use it to
pay your bills. It’s also fairly straightforward to think about which currency
to keep this in. Just keep it in whichever currency your expenses are in. For
me, it is about 95% in shekel and 5% in dollars.
Wicked
Money. I was recently reading an article about successful investors and was
inspired by one of the ideas that they shared. The idea came from a wealthy
investor who always keeps $2 million sitting in a reserve account. This way, he
never has to touch the money that he has invested. I suppose he is thinking
that he may want to suddenly buy a house and does not want to have to worry
about selling stocks.
In any case,
I think this is a very good idea. You want the money that you invest to be off
limits until you reach your financial goals. That is the only way you will be
able to take a long term perspective on the investments.
To figure
how much you should keep in backup, I recommend that you think about all the
terrible things that could go wrong and consider how much cash you would like
to have on hand to see your way through them. Personally, that makes me too sad
to think about so I just use 6 months after-tax salary as my guide.
It makes
sense that this money would just be sitting in your checking account; or, you
could invest it in a short term deposit like a money market. If you are living in Israel, the emergency that
we hope will never happen will most likely occur in shekel, although it may be
so far away that having dollars is not really an issue. I wouldn’t know, I don’t
think about bad things. I keep it allocated 75/25, with the larger part in
shekel.
Wise Money.
I skip now to retirement money because it is the next easiest to think
about. This money is like the very opposite of the money that you are using to
live right now. It is money that you are planning to use to live when you
retire. If you are very far away from retirement (25+ years), you can allocate
a great deal of this money to stocks. If you outlook is shorter, you will want
to decrease the stock allocation accordingly. I personally try to allocate 80%
to stocks in my retirement accounts.
In terms of
shekel or dollars (or other), it also depends on how far away retirement is.
The further away, the less fluctuations in currency should matter. I like to
keep all of the money that is not in stocks in its local currency and for the
money that is in stocks, anywhere from 20%-80% of it invested in a foreign
currency. The actual amount varies each year depending on exactly which markets
look like the best value at the moment. I apply the same approach to foreign
currency both for retirement accounts in Israel and in the U.S.
I-Have-No-Idea
Money. The final category of money is all money which is not in the other
categories. This means money in non-retirement accounts which you not using for
daily living expenses and is beyond the amount of money you feel you need as
back-up money. This money is certainly the hardest because I have no idea what
it’s for. Some possibilities:
- Paying for celebrations such as bar or bat mitzvahs; or maybe, weddings
- To help finance advanced education for your children
- To leave over as an inheritance
- Buying an insurance policy on your only goat
- Early retirement
- For paying down your mortgage in a case where interest rates rise and you can no longer afford it
- Buying a new car
- Buying a second home
In these
cases, it seems to me that the time horizon for this money is like a moving
target. For some of it, I think I may want it earlier, perhaps in about 5
years. For other money, I think I may not need it for 10 years or longer.
I’m
sufficiently confused with this money to not be entirely sure what to do with
it. However, because I already have money in backup which I could use for some
or part of these expenses, I feel comfortable taking a longer term outlook.
That’s why I have opted for a classic 60/40 allocation between stocks and bonds
for this money. I also balance it 50/50 between shekels and dollars. On the one
hand, I will most likely want to buy things in shekel with this money; however,
outlook is long enough that I’m not overly concerned with currency
fluctuations. Obviously, if your family is traditional, your wife should address this money.
One last
thought on the different types of money. How should you think about money that
you are planning to use to buy a house in the next few years?
Honestly
speaking, this is Simple money. No one wants to be left out as the stock
market skyrockets, but you should take into consideration that stocks have wide
swings in value. Any money that you invest in stocks may not be there when it’s
time for your next house payment. The same is true for longer term bonds; and
also, for those with intermediate term. Changes in interest rates could
significantly raise or lower the value of these investments in the shorter
term.
Summary
& Conclusion
In a single
table, here is what my allocation plan looks like:
Type
|
Stocks/Bonds
|
Currency
|
Simple
|
Checking Account
|
95/5, between shekel/dollar
|
Wicked
|
Short Term Deposits
|
75/25, between shekel/dollar
|
Wise
|
80/20
|
Bonds in “local” currency, stocks between 20-80% in “foreign”
currency
|
I-Have-No-Idea
|
60/40
|
50/50 between shekel/dollar
|
So now,
loyal readers, I have now given you all that I can to help you come up with
your own plan. At this point, if you have any wine left, I recommend that you
drink it, especially if it is almost midnight.
Oh, and one
last thing…
Who Knows
13?
I do. It is
the number of ha-ggadot in this blog. If can’t find them all, try holding
this blog upside down. The answers are always there when you hold things upside down.